The big question is why CSK does not play Washington Sundar, Sai Sudarshan and Sai Kishore. Apart from this, Baba Aparajit would have stayed with Dhoni for at least 4 seasons and he would have got a chance in any tournament? No. Knowing that powerhouse Kolkata won yesterday's match on a very slow pitch, CSK did not give their bowlers and batsmen a chance to develop or showcase their multifaceted skills.

With such pitches, talented players like Rudraraj Gaikwad are unable to play on good green top pitches and bowling pitches. Just one T20, and that too for CSK, would make Sofim the go-to player for everyone. Shivam Dubey also met the same fate as one can understand how a great player like Devon Conway was limited to a single dimension and his performance deteriorated in the international matches he played after playing for CSK.

Rachin Ravindra is another good and amazing player. But if he plays international cricket after playing for CSK, his reactions will be ready for such slow pitches and becoming a soap will become impossible. Since the final was held in Chennai, we can assume that a team's place in the final is confirmed. It is not good to limit cricket to one dimension for the grand farewell of one personality, Dhoni. Yesterday Mustafizur Rahman bowled like a left arm spinner. It's all about making the fast bowlers spin and pitching the bat and the spinners bowling fast balls to free up their spin skills.

The aggressiveness of batsmen on balls coming below their waist can make it difficult for them to play good pitches. CSK players have always had these losses. Therefore, only players who have retired from international cricket would be the right people for CSK's cricket mantra. RCB is the second team. Every innings played by Kohli, his fans celebrate like the disciples of Parmarth Guru. But some experts say that the reason for the failure of RCB is high voltage commercial player Virat Kohli.

Because there is a suspicion that there is an unwritten order that when the wicketkeeper bowls, the players bowling at the opposite end must take a single and star him. Just as CSK is destroying the versatility of its players and the multidimensionality of the game of cricket with sluggish pitches, RCB is building a colossus around Kohli, a player full of commercial aura. This is suppression of individual cricket.

CSK's successes are due to such disruptions while RCB's failures are due to the individual Kohli's image building. It is inevitable that we come to the conclusion that losing the multi-dimensional abilities of players in the game of cricket is against the ethos of the game.