Team India won the Pune T20 against England and with this the series also became his name. However, after the defeat in Pune, a big ruckus has arisen. This controversy is about the Convention Substitute, which has to face the defeat of the England team. English captain Jot Butler has said a lot on this contingent substitute. Jose Butler said that he does not agree with the Convention Substitute used in Pune T20. According to him, there was a mistake in this and he directly questioned the decision of the match referee. Let us tell you what Joss Butler finally said?

Jose Butler raised questions on Contingency Substitute

After defeat in Pune T20, England captain Jose Butler came to the press conference. Where he raised questions on the decision on the Contingon Substitute in a conversation with the media. According to him, the decision of the match referee was not correct. In fact, during the Indian innings, Shivam Dubey's helmet got ball in the last over. When he went out of the field, he complained of dizziness. After this, Team India replaced the Convention Substitute. Team India replaced Dubey with Harshit Rana. The match referee allowed it.

Jos buttler has had his saying on the like-for-like concussion replacement controversy

Watch #INDVENG on @TNTSPORTS , @discoveryplusuk pic.twitter.com/v32hbutrlc

- Cricket on TNT Sports (@CrickTont) January 31, 2025

Why dispute over Harshit Rana

Let us now tell you that why is there a dispute over the unloading of Harshit Rana as a concentration substitute? Actually, under the Convention Substitute Rules, the player who is hurt, the team can put the same player on the field. Now Shivam Dubey is a batting all -rounder but Harshit Rana is a bowling all -rounder. There is a lot of difference between the bowling of both, in such a situation, according to the rule, the England captain has raised questions on this.

The interesting thing is that Harshit Rana became the major reason for England's defeat. Rana dismissed Liam Livingston in his first over and after that he took two wickets. He conceded just 6 runs in the 19th over and he also took the important wicket of overton, the result was England's defeat. The rule of the Convention Substitute caused a lot of damage to England. Former England captain Michael Vaughan questioned this. Even according to former Indian cricketer Akash Chopra, Ramandeep Singh had to replace Shivam Dubey under the Contingon Substitute Rules. Meaning he was also not in favor of Harshit Rana.