sanjeev
khelja|23-10-2024
Some pointed out that the fielder's position constituted an illegal fielding arrangement, which should have resulted in a no-ball rather than the dead-ball call that erased the six. Despite the protests, the umpire maintained that he had called the dead ball before the delivery, rendering any further discussions moot.
Why Bangladesh A Were Frustrated? The Bangladesh A team felt that if the delivery had been allowed as a fair ball or signaled a no-ball, the six would have drastically shifted the momentum in their favor. At a critical juncture in the match, losing those six runs was seen as a significant disadvantage, particularly with just 37 runs needed off the remaining 18 balls. Ultimately, this missed opportunity severely affected their chances of winning the match. MCC Laws Regarding Fielders and Dead-Ball Bangladesh A's argument stemmed from MCC Law 28.4, which limits the number of fielders behind the popping crease on the leg side to two. The law states: "At the instant of the bowler's delivery, there shall not be more than two fielders, other than the wicketkeeper, behind the popping crease on the on-side." If breached, this results in a no-ball being called by the umpire. Meanwhile, under MCC Law 20.6, once a dead ball is called, the umpire's decision stands: "Once the ball is dead, no revoking of any decision can bring the ball back into play for that delivery." The Final Outcome of the Match Despite Abu Hider's late efforts, including a boundary in the same over, Bangladesh A could not recover the lost momentum and eventually lost by 19 runs. Sri Lanka A's disciplined bowling ensured their progression to the semifinals as group toppers, while Bangladesh A were eliminated from the tournament. This controversy adds to the growing list of dead-ball discussions in cricket, but the umpire's adherence to the rules ensured the dead ball remained final, even though it left Bangladesh A's players and fans disappointed.