
Samira Vishwas
Tezzbuzz|20-10-2026
Delhi: Big news has come out about Shefali Verma, the vice-captain of the Indian women's cricket team. The International Cricket Council (ICC) has reprimanded him for violating the code of conduct. Along with this, one demerit point has also been added to his disciplinary record. This action has been taken regarding his behavior on the field during the second T20 International match against Zimbabwe.
This incident happened in the second T20 match played between India and Zimbabwe in Raipur on Sunday.
Indian bowler Shri Charani was bowling in the 12th over of Zimbabwe's innings. Meanwhile, Shefali dropped the catch of Chipo Mugeri-Tiripano in the mid-off area. Frustrated at missing the catch, Shefali threw the ball on the ground in anger. His behavior was considered against the rules.According to the official statement of the ICC, Shefali was found guilty of violating Article 2.2 of the Code of Conduct.
This rule pertains to improper use of cricket equipment, clothing or other grounds- facilities during an international match. This case has been considered a Level-1 violation.Shefali Verma admitted her mistake and accepted the punishment suggested by ICC Match Referee Panel member GS Lakshmi. For this reason, there was no formal hearing in the case. This is his first such violation in the last 24 months.
According to ICC rules, a player can be given a warning or official reprimand for a Level-1 offence.
Apart from this, a maximum fine of 50 percent of the match fee and one or two demerit points can also be given. In Shefali's case, it has been decided to give one demerit point along with reprimand.Why did ICC take action against Shefali Verma?
The ICC found Shefali Verma guilty of violating the code of conduct for throwing the ball on the ground in anger after missing the catch.
What punishment has Shefali Verma received?
The ICC issued him an official reprimand and added one demerit point to his disciplinary record.
How did Shefali Verma react to ICC's decision?
Shefali Verma accepted her mistake and accepted the proposed punishment. Therefore, there was no formal hearing in the matter.




