'I think it should be taken out': Ajinkya Rahane joins calls to abolish IPL's Impact Player rule
toi
newspoint|10-10-2026
The debate over the Impact Player rule in the Indian Premier League continues to intensify, with former India cricketer Ajinkya Rahane becoming the latest to call for its removal. Rahane believes the rule has outlived its purpose and is hampering the development of all-rounders in Indian cricket.
Speaking to Cricbuzz, the former Kolkata Knight Riders and Rajasthan Royals captain said there was little benefit in continuing the rule, which allows teams to substitute a player during a match.
Rahane questions Impact Player rule's relevance
"I think it should be taken out," Rahane, who has led Kolkata Knight Riders and Rajasthan Royals in the league, told Cricbuzz.
"I remember last year, before the IPL captains' meeting, most of the captains said they don't want the impact player rule. And I think the guidelines or the rules, they have it till 2027. So we don't know if this year they will take it out or after this year (when) the big auction is coming up, in that they will take it out. But ideally, I feel there is no point or use in having an impact rule," he added.
The rule has also been hampering the growth of all-rounders in Indian cricket as franchises tend to replace batters with bowlers and vice-versa to get the best possible result with the bat or the ball.
Hardik Pandya 's absence from the Indian team has often found the Indian team searching for cover-ups, and although Shivam Dube and Nitish Reddy have turned up, they are still far from Hardik's capabilities. Moreover, there seem to be not many all-rounders in the pipeline, especially the fast-bowling all-rounders, which has been a rarity now in Indian cricket.
Rahane wants bowlers to get more opportunities
"All-rounders are going out of the game, especially in the IPL. And I am a firm believer that you've got to develop your all-rounders. From the Indian team's point of view, all-rounders are really important. So the impact player rule should be taken out.
"See, why I feel we should take it out is because last year, I don't want to take any team's name, but a few teams were probably at 90/7, 100/7, and they ended up getting 200 because of that one impact (rule), one extra batter with that. So, I feel (we should) give some advantage to bowlers, and also all-rounders should be involved in the games thoroughly. They should take it out," he added.
Speaking to Cricbuzz, the former Kolkata Knight Riders and Rajasthan Royals captain said there was little benefit in continuing the rule, which allows teams to substitute a player during a match.
Rahane questions Impact Player rule's relevance
"I think it should be taken out," Rahane, who has led Kolkata Knight Riders and Rajasthan Royals in the league, told Cricbuzz.
"I remember last year, before the IPL captains' meeting, most of the captains said they don't want the impact player rule. And I think the guidelines or the rules, they have it till 2027. So we don't know if this year they will take it out or after this year (when) the big auction is coming up, in that they will take it out. But ideally, I feel there is no point or use in having an impact rule," he added.
The rule has also been hampering the growth of all-rounders in Indian cricket as franchises tend to replace batters with bowlers and vice-versa to get the best possible result with the bat or the ball.
Hardik Pandya 's absence from the Indian team has often found the Indian team searching for cover-ups, and although Shivam Dube and Nitish Reddy have turned up, they are still far from Hardik's capabilities. Moreover, there seem to be not many all-rounders in the pipeline, especially the fast-bowling all-rounders, which has been a rarity now in Indian cricket.
Rahane wants bowlers to get more opportunities
"All-rounders are going out of the game, especially in the IPL. And I am a firm believer that you've got to develop your all-rounders. From the Indian team's point of view, all-rounders are really important. So the impact player rule should be taken out.
"See, why I feel we should take it out is because last year, I don't want to take any team's name, but a few teams were probably at 90/7, 100/7, and they ended up getting 200 because of that one impact (rule), one extra batter with that. So, I feel (we should) give some advantage to bowlers, and also all-rounders should be involved in the games thoroughly. They should take it out," he added.
Related News
Latest Newsmore
IND vs WI: Hope, Rutherford onslaught flattens India as Windies mow down 250
10-Oct-2026 • Samira Vishwas
Tilak Verma turned out to be faster than Virat Kohli, achieved big success in T20 cricket
10-Oct-2026 • Samira Vishwas
India's Shock Defeat Despite 249 Runs: Gautam Gambhir Points To Real Problem
10-Oct-2026 • Shivam Sharma
‘Just not cricket’: India’s flat-pitch problem isn’t fair to budding bowlers
10-Oct-2026 • Samira Vishwas
What is the highest successful chase in T20Is?
10-Oct-2026 • Samira Vishwas