'Not exactly what was required': Sunil Gavaskar questions India's bowling choices after West Indies defeat
toi
newspoint|10-10-2026
Former India captain Sunil Gavaskar has questioned India's bowling decisions during their six-wicket defeat to the West Indies in the second T20I in Ranchi.
He believes India could have used fast bowlers Arshdeep Singh or Mayank Yadav for the 18th over instead of Axar Patel, as the visitors chased down a target of 250 to level the five-match series 1-1.
India scored 249/5, but the West Indies reached 252/4 in 19.2 overs, completing the highest successful T20I chase against India.
Gavaskar questions bowling choices
Gavaskar felt Mayank, who took three wickets and gave India early breakthroughs, could have been a better choice to bowl the 18th over, even though Arshdeep had conceded plenty of runs in his final over.
“Definitely! I would have gone with either Arshdeep or Mayank. Yes, Arshdeep went for plenty in his final over, but Mayank had struck the early blows. Of the wickets that had fallen, he had taken three. His economy rate was about 12 an over, and at that stage, the West Indies needed more than that. So, if he had taken a wicket, and sometimes when the game is going in your favour, who knows, you would have got a wicket even if it had not been off a great delivery,” Gavaskar told JioStar.
He added that taking another wicket could have put pressure on the West Indies by forcing a new batter to come to the crease.
Kuldeep could have been a better option
Gavaskar also questioned India's decision to bring Shivam Dube into the attack in the ninth over. He felt left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep Yadav might have been a better choice while the West Indies batters were still settling in.
“And once you get a wicket, suddenly, the opposition is on the back foot. A new batter has to come in. So, maybe that could have been tried. For me, I think giving Shivam Dube the ball in that ninth over was not exactly what was required at that stage. When the batters were still trying to get their eye in, maybe Kuldeep coming in would have been a better idea,” he added.
India struggled to contain Shai Hope and Sherfane Rutherford after their early breakthroughs. Hope remained unbeaten on 102 off 45 balls, while Rutherford smashed 84 off 37 deliveries.
Their 120-run partnership turned the chase in the visitors' favour, leaving India with questions to answer ahead of the third T20I in Indore.
Their 120-run partnership turned the chase in the visitors' favour, leaving India with questions to answer ahead of the third T20I in Indore.
He believes India could have used fast bowlers Arshdeep Singh or Mayank Yadav for the 18th over instead of Axar Patel, as the visitors chased down a target of 250 to level the five-match series 1-1.
India scored 249/5, but the West Indies reached 252/4 in 19.2 overs, completing the highest successful T20I chase against India.
Gavaskar questions bowling choices
Gavaskar felt Mayank, who took three wickets and gave India early breakthroughs, could have been a better choice to bowl the 18th over, even though Arshdeep had conceded plenty of runs in his final over.
“Definitely! I would have gone with either Arshdeep or Mayank. Yes, Arshdeep went for plenty in his final over, but Mayank had struck the early blows. Of the wickets that had fallen, he had taken three. His economy rate was about 12 an over, and at that stage, the West Indies needed more than that. So, if he had taken a wicket, and sometimes when the game is going in your favour, who knows, you would have got a wicket even if it had not been off a great delivery,” Gavaskar told JioStar.
He added that taking another wicket could have put pressure on the West Indies by forcing a new batter to come to the crease.
Kuldeep could have been a better option
Gavaskar also questioned India's decision to bring Shivam Dube into the attack in the ninth over. He felt left-arm wrist spinner Kuldeep Yadav might have been a better choice while the West Indies batters were still settling in.
“And once you get a wicket, suddenly, the opposition is on the back foot. A new batter has to come in. So, maybe that could have been tried. For me, I think giving Shivam Dube the ball in that ninth over was not exactly what was required at that stage. When the batters were still trying to get their eye in, maybe Kuldeep coming in would have been a better idea,” he added.
India struggled to contain Shai Hope and Sherfane Rutherford after their early breakthroughs. Hope remained unbeaten on 102 off 45 balls, while Rutherford smashed 84 off 37 deliveries.
Their 120-run partnership turned the chase in the visitors' favour, leaving India with questions to answer ahead of the third T20I in Indore.
Their 120-run partnership turned the chase in the visitors' favour, leaving India with questions to answer ahead of the third T20I in Indore.
Related News
Latest Newsmore
Steve Smith joins elite company with major milestone in AUS vs SA 2026 1st Test
10-Oct-2026 • Sandy Verma
15 dangerous records which were broken in India vs West Indies 2nd T20
10-Oct-2026 • Samira Vishwas
Mulder, Jansen and Nortje help South Africa reduce Australia to 187-6 on shortened Day 1 in Durban
10-Oct-2026 • Samira Vishwas
India fell short by 249 runs, Shai Hope-Rutherford gave West Indies a record win by 6 wickets
10-Oct-2026 • Samira Vishwas
Arjun Tendulkar left out of Goa’s Ranji Trophy squad
10-Oct-2026 • Samira Vishwas